Developerme
3
7
4
Twitter have seen many famous and infamous fights, loves and comments. We all have witnessed how a 156 character tweet has made people uber-famous and how a small comment has destroyed many careers. For today, things are little different as we bring you two female actresses, both super cool and sound in their field from the perspective of Twitter.
This all started, when Shibani Dandekar’s tweet targetted Ankita Lokhande.
In her recent tweet, Shibani attacked Ankita Lokhande for being not able to handle her relationship and used Sushant Singh Rajput. Shibani is one of the close friends of Rhea Chakraborty’s from the industry, and perhaps this made her angry on Ankita Lokhande recent post where she has penned an open letter and accused Chakraborty of allowing Sushant Singh Rajput, Ankit Lokhande boyfriend to consume drugs. In a tweet, Shibani tagged Ankita as a “princess of patriarchy” and blamed that the TV actress has played a “major role in this ”witch-hunt”.”
Ankita Lokhande on Wednesday, while addressing Rhea Chakraborty wrote:
“On one hand, she says she was coordinating with all the doctors for his betterment of health on request of SSR, and on the other hand, she was coordinating drug logistics for him. Would anyone, who claims to have loved someone so deeply, allow the other person to consume drugs claiming to know his mental state and condition?”
Also, she added, Rhea being the closest person to Sushant, should have prohibited him from consuming drugs.
Shibani, on the other hand, today, lashed at Ankita and slammed her for “capitalizing on Rhea being targeted.” In her tweet, she wrote
“This woman wants her 2 seconds of fame and has capitalized on Rhea being targeted because she has had never dealt with her relationship issues with Sushant.. she has been the driving force behind this, and she needs to be called out!”
But it doesn’t end here; she went ahead to note “She also needs to shut the hell up. Enough Ankita! No one has more hate in their heart (?) than you,” On her Instagram account.
In another instance, NDTV reported, Rhea has said in her bail petition that “not committed any crime whatsoever and has been falsely implicated in the case,”
Rhea also added further,
“During her custody, the applicant was coerced into making self-incriminatory confessions. By her application dated September 8, the applicant has formally retracted all such incriminatory confessions,”
How Did It All Started?
Ankita Lokhande On Wednesday Wrote a note on her Instagram account to clarify her instance on Sushant.
“I again clarify, for the reason time and again being asked by the media to me on whether I feel it’s a murder or suicide? I have never said it’s a murder or anyone, in particular, is responsible. I always have encouraged justice for my late friend SSR and stood by the bereaved family, and truth should be brought out by the investigating agencies. Being a Maharashtrian and an Indian citizen, I have total faith in the Maharashtra State Govt/Police & Central Government instrumentalities. Though when some lingos like “Sautan” and “widow” were used for me, which is in public knowledge. I never responded to it. I only came forward to narrate about SSR and his mental health till 2016.”
She also replied to her hers by writing
“Dear Haters! Let us assume you must have known in and out about your friend and whats going on in her life and relationship. Glad to see you wake up finally, but I wish you would have woken up sooner and advised your friend not to support any drug abuse by SSR if any.”
Ankita has further added,
“When she very well knew about his mental state by publicly stating that he was in depression. Should she have allowed a depressed man to consume drugs? How is that going to help? His condition would deteriorate to a level that would make a man take the action that SSR has allegedly taken. She was the closest person to him at that time. On the one hand, she says she was coordinating with all the doctors for his betterment of health on request of SSR, and on the other hand, she was coordinating drug logistics for him.”
3
7
4
